Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Investing Focal Points... and a loving reminder.

  • In an inflationary world, stocks outperform bonds, and long-term bonds fare particularly badly.
  • Foreign stocks with undervalued currencies outperform stocks denominated in inflating currencies.
  • Chinese equities will continue to offer their outsized gains over the next several years, even after the amazing run thus far in 2009.

Most experienced, successful investors try to maintain a levelheaded approach to their portfolios. They try to observe the same principles through good times and bad. They try to rely more on historical perspective than on an analysis of day-to-day news developments. They stick to high-quality investments and they resign themselves to the fact that some market downturns will take them by surprise. They willingly take on some risk, however, because they know that this brings the opportunity for growth, in dividends and in capital.


Less experienced (and, generally, less successful) investors set out with the same goals, but often fail to attain them. Lacking historical perspective, they see great importance in every news release and prime rate change. This, though, can sabotage their efforts, by making them lose sight of the overall picture.


In times like these, for instance, with media reports of poor credit ratings and companies going bankrupt, some inexperienced investors quit thinking like investors. Instead, they start to think like bankers. Instead of looking for opportunity, they devote themselves to avoiding risk. This ensures they'll miss out on opportunity. When investors think like bankers, after all, they forget that they're trying to limit losses, not avoid them altogether. If you let yourself be cowed by the possibility of loss, you just might sell out when risk appears to be greatest — when prices are at the bottom. That's when you ought to be holding on, if not buying.


Mr. Bernard Baruch, who made a stock-market fortune in the first half of the twentieth century, used to advise investors, "Don't try to buy at the bottom and sell at the top. This can't be done, except by liars." However, many successful, experienced investors do manage to avoid selling at the bottom and do avoid buying at the top, most of the time. They do this by following a level-headed approach through boom and bust and by sticking to what we refer to only half-jokingly around the office as 'that old-time religion' — gradually buying a balanced, diversified portfolio of high-quality stocks and sticking with it for long periods.


The funny thing is that bankers make the opposite mistake. They too can profit from a levelheaded approach and historical perspective. For traditional bankers, this comes down to trying to avoid as much risk as possible, at all times. After all, the best that a traditional banker can hope for is to get the bank's money back, plus interest. At market tops, however, some bankers start to think like investors.


Instead of avoiding risk, these bankers start to fret about missing out on opportunity — and missing out on huge bonuses. They make high-risk bets in hopes of striking it rich rather than sticking to tried and true lines of business. Indeed, the management of investment-banking firm Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch bet their companies' futures — and lost.


If you do try to time the market — to buy at the bottom and sell at the top — then you need to think like a banker or an investor, depending upon financial conditions. When profits and stock prices have risen for some years and everything looks rosy, think like a banker — focus on risk and dwell on what it will cost you if something goes wrong.

In times like today, however, when profits and stock prices are down from their peaks, you should think like an investor. Get used to the idea of taking on risk. But deal with it by gradually buying a diversified portfolio of dividend-paying, high-quality stocks. Recognize, too, that stock prices already reflect most of the risks you hear about in the media.


As an investor, you should observe the standard rules. But you also have to keep opportunity and the prospects for growth in mind. After all, that's what makes it worthwhile to be in the stock market. It also protects you from another less-obvious risk: running out of money before you run out of time.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

The Immutable Principles of Energy

Jim Halloran, a financial analyst of the oil/gas industry now with Russell Energy Advisors at Financial America Securities, recently sent along to his various contacts something he came up with called "The Immutable Principles of Energy". I liked it, and thought it was worth passing on verbatim to readers of my blog:

1. Never confuse reserves with production.
2. The biggest, best fields are discovered first.
3. Commodities are priced at the margin – the last 1% dictates the price.
4. E&P companies are serial destroyers of capital. Any appearance to the contrary is a temporary aberration, usually due to hoped-for, unsustainable pricing gains.
5. More than any other sector, time is money with respect to Energy.
6. The more efficient we become in our use of energy, the more we will use (Jevons’ Paradox).
7. The more society expands and demands greater access to energy, the more it will create roadblocks to its delivery.
8. We desire six qualities in our energy sources: 1) Affordability (cheap); 2) Abundance; 3) Reliability; 4) Purity; 5) Universal access; 6) Environmentally friendly. There is no set of circumstances under which all of these can exist simultaneously.
9. There exists at least a “$2 differential” between crude oil and competing sources of energy, regardless of the price of crude oil.
10. In dealing with OPEC, pay attention to what its members do, and give little heed to what they say.
11. Governments look at energy fields as sources of revenue, not as sources of energy:· Governments have a disincentive to promote efficiency/conservation· Income streams will be protected as to magnitude· Long-term energy planning is incompatible with political realities.
12. Once a field goes into decline, it will not increase production beyond this peak in the future without capex infusions that will prove to be uneconomic.
13. Crude oil is universal. The price you pay for gasoline is determined more by the small producer in Colombia than by the Wal*Mart on the corner.
14. Natural gas is local. The price will continue to be set by continental production even after the lawyers have given up fighting the LNG terminals.
15. The media know nothing about the oil business. The more strident the published predictions of a price extension above (below) extreme levels, the closer the oil market is to a temporary top (bottom).
16. “It’s always something” - Roseanne Roseannadanna

Monday, November 23, 2009

Investment Idea: Nuclear Energy... No-Clear Waste?


Nuclear energy.......

True foresight may lead you to buy into Uranium now.

The Democrats have always traditionally been the ones to stand in the way of any forward momentum for pursuit of this energy, but with this financial crisis (very large to see an absolute fix by Obama’s 4th year in office), general discontent in the public may see another Republican in office next election. This will once again put Nuclear back on the front page.

There was an interesting article in Esquire regarding Eric Loewen and his Sodium FAST Reactor which is gaining traction. Interesting because this reactor produces energy from the waste produced from nuclear reactors (which is the number one hurdle for the pursuit of nuclear energy to begin with). So what is nuclear waste? It's still 99% uranium and It's still usable. But 1% is transuranics. (Which are very fast neutrons that make fission very difficult and dangerous, but with these fast reactors, can be slowed down for viability... Since no CO2 is released with nuclear, what other energy source in the world is there for a true game changing event?)

So, near-term easy fossil fuels aside, investing in a uranium miner or 2 might be an ideal path to follow.

Also Lithium, due to its small global supply along with the recent and exceptional increase in electrical motivation by Global auto producers, but that’s another story.

Cheers.

PS. Here’s the link to the FAST reactor article. A very interesting read. (Found in Esquire of all places...)

http://www.esquire.com/features/best-and-brightest-2009/nuclear-waste-disposal-1209

Friday, November 20, 2009

A good lesson...... An interesting reminder.....


One of the fantastic things I enjoy most about travelling is viewing the magnificent architecture. Witnessing the great dramatic feats of human ingenuity is something that resounds within me, and my passions involving the great themes of historical endeavor tend to coincide with many stories in the industry of wealth management.

A fine example was seeing the Sydney Harbour Bridge in all its glory. I marvel at the fact that it was built at a time when there was about 4 cars in Sydney (or was it 5?), and officially opened in 1932. These days about 160,000 vehicles use the bridge each day. What amazing foresight they had way back in the 1920's when they began such a project! There's a lesson in that for us all: Live in today, and for today! But make sure to plan and allow for the future!

Monday, November 16, 2009

Why Should I Have An Investment Advisor?


Twenty years ago, before the creation of CNBC and before the media spent as much time as it does now on market watching, investors had more difficulty getting economic information and market impact assessment. This lack of information gave investment dealers, fund managers, and other larger-scale investors a relative advantage. Today, investors have access to much of the information available to institutions, although that has not altered the importance of in-house economic research. In fact, today’s market participants are so inundated with information that the quality of the analysis is even more important; investors must sort out useful information from misleading or worthless information.

Unfortunately, the media does not always explain what is behind reported numbers either. Media sound bites tend to be superficial and often miss the most interesting or meaningful aspects of the particular event or data release. For example, the media may report that retail sales are strong, without explaining whether this strength is the result of outstanding performance in just a few categories or good performance in a broad range of categories. An advisor's role is to take a closer look at the numbers and brief their clients on the broader implications for specific sectors of the economy and forecasts.

Market participants sometimes use the word noise when discussing certain economic releases, which means ambiguous messages from a single report or mixed readings from a series of releases. Noisy data can hide the real direction of an underlying variable or of the economy in general. Advisor's use many tools to filter out the noise, including seasonal adjustments, moving averages, and trend analysis. Short-term fluctuations in the data may provide investors with tactical trading opportunities as market participants react to monthly changes in the data. It is important, however, to be aware of long-term trends to properly position the strategic asset allocation mix.

This is the underlying goal of any sound portfolio strategy, and one that needs continual guidance. Which is also where the professional advisor truly earns his keep.

Regards.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Don't sell!! - Seven reasons to remain positive on Equities.

1) Macro outlook
We still believe that 2010 GDP growth will come in close to 4% globally and 3% in the US. The latest ISM report supports this view, with the headline index, at 55.7, being in expansion territory (i.e., above 50) for the third consecutive month. The figure is consistent with GDP growth of about 3.1%. We also note that the ISM employment component had the biggest monthly gain since 1983.

Admittedly, the new orders component has fallen for the second month in a row. However, a slowdown in ISM new orders 9 months into a recovery is perfectly normal (and typically lasts 3 months) and in 11 out of the last 15 ISM cycles, ISM new orders has then carried on to make new highs. And on these occasions equities also did well (apart from the 1 month after its initial peak).

2) Earnings
The Q3 results season in the US is close to being the best ever, in spite of revenue expectations for 2009 still being below levels of 3 or 6 months ago.

3) Many credit & macro indicators are at levels they held when equities were 25% higher
Equities have continued to lag credit. When high yield spreads and credit spreads were last at current levels, the S&P 500 was 25% and 30% higher, respectively.

4) Valuation
All our long-term valuation measures show equities to be broadly in line with their longterm averages. -One favoured measure is the equity risk premium. This is currently 4.4% on trend earnings, compared to a long-run average of 3.6%. If we were to input consensus earnings, it is a
much higher 5.5%.

5) Positioning
Retail investors are still cautiously positioned on our data. Money market funds are at 27%
of market cap, compared to a long term average of 19%. Since the start of Q3, retail investors have been net sellers of equities ($4bn), but net buyers of bonds ($166bn) – with $270bn of outflows from money market funds Our model of retail buying of equities (based on the gap between the bond and the earnings yield as well as price momentum) suggests retail should indeed be buying equity.

6) Excess liquidity is close to an all-time high
Excess liquidity – global narrow money minus IP growth - is close to an all time high… it will slow, but excess liquidity tends to be good for financial assets. -According to the IMF, only 26% of announced quantitative easing has yet to be implemented. In the US, there is another $326bn of QE to be implemented, although the Fed have just finished their programme of buying US Treasuries.

7) Tactical indicators
The equity sentiment indicator (based on VIX, put/call, skew, inflows into aggressive growth funds) is high, but not as high as in 2003/4. Historically, the S&P 500 has performed well after the equity sentiment indicator hit current levels.


A Side Note: Focus on high dividend yield with positive earnings momentum.
High dividend yield was the best performing style in the first 18 months of the last bull market. The earnings momentum style has recently started to outperform, after underperforming between the March market low and September (just as it did in the first 5 months of the last bull market) and the style looks abnormally cheap.

(Above mentioned courtesy of C Suisse Global Equity research report - Nov 3, 09)

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Approaching The End Of October.


3 days of falling markets and all of a sudden Halloween may look to be a little scarier this year. I'll admit that being contrarian to the contrarians has paid off this year, and that our fully invested strategy of picking up growth at cheaply valued prices has allowed us to bulk up during these tumultuous times. Is this the second wave that everyone was waiting for? The second opportunity for those who sat the sidelines in shell-shocked disbelief as markets ran for the better part of this year?



Seems agreeable to think so... Or maybe it seems easier to think so... For nothing effects us as investors worse than that of hindsight. Of seeing lost opportunity, and inadvertently dwelling in dismay of the riches we should have made. But remember, hindsight may embolden you to sway from your plan and fall victim to the emotional roller coaster.


To be led, or to lead...


That is a million dollar question that defines overall success in ones investment strategy, and is the question I ask myself every day before picking up that newspaper, or turning on the "talking heads" of business television. It's worth it's weight in gold to ask this question when fighting the urge to act emotionally. This is something I value in the actions of other professionals in my field who manage to tame this beast and stick by their convictions.

The following is an excerpt from an email a colleague sent to me regarding the fall in the market of late. I hope it helps you to see past the influence of negative bearish sentiment that has been unleashed by many in the media lime-light:

"I just wanted to share something I saw on the CNBC website. They were four headlines:

- Fast money traders say tech decline may mean bull dead.
- Art Cashin says dollar decline carry trade could cause BIG pullback.
- Stocks are at least 20% overvalued....Rosenberg.
- Doug Kass says markets have made highs for year.


Almost makes you want to sell everything. I would resist that temptation as all of these headlines are very bullish. You may find 2 out of 10 people that are bullish. That is a perfect scenario.

It amazes me that tech can act so well since March and they start to correct which is very healthy and the fast traders are calling for their demise. Art Cashin has been bearish for the last 150 S&P points- eventually he will be right. Our good friend at Gluskin has been bearish since 666- not good. And Doug Kass who made a fantastic call in March sadly decided to get off the train at 950 S&P and so he is reiterating his bearish call made 6 weeks ago.

We are currently down 3.4 % on the S&P from recent high and as we all know, the avg. % drop since Mar 9 has been just over 5%. Even if we get a sharp short pullback to 1000 which would be just over 9% just like the June- July selling period, don't be deterred. Stay the course, stay invested as the S&P will likely continue to foil the bears and close 2009 upwards of 80 % from the March lows.

Have a great day. Happy investing." - Cheers.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

My Burgeoning Philosophy.

People always ask me what my minimum net-worth standards are for clients, and I always respond with; "that depends... The nature and culture of my firm dictates that the ideal client has a minimum of $1M in investible assets (could be household), or has other dynamics like the young professional family with rather large income streams (IE. Great growth potential), or a focus on an entrepreneurial business owner who may not have the largest asset base to begin with, but the bulk of his money is in his business that he will one day sell, triggering a special event in which my services are definitely of added value."

Quite the mouth-full... I hear other advisors speak about their ideal client and they can usually spit it out in 1 quick sentence. The more I look at it, the more I don't want to define my clients by minimum net-worth standards, but by someone with integrity, honesty and respect. Someone who is interested in receiving and willing to act on good advice, and who is willing to sit and share thoughts and insights on family, friends, and anything else of true value to them.

The following is a quote I recently read from a top Canadian advisor publication that I find truly sums up my own thoughts regarding my place in the industry, and how I define myself as a wealth manager:

"When an investment advisor looks at the glass of water, he will tell you that it is half full, and is filling up quickly so you should buy a bigger glass. An insurance agent will warn you that a half-empty glass leaves the future uncertain so you should insure against possible consequences. An accountant will tell you that you paid too much for the glass because it is too big. My goal is to ensure my clients have considered all these issues, focusing on the importance of the water, not the glass." (Courtesy of Mr. Blair Corkum, Corkum & Associates)

Friday, September 18, 2009

No one's cornered the market on the best strategy.

It's interesting that as of late I have been receiving phone calls and emails from clients who are questioning the recent run in the markets. It is the old "sky is falling" reverberation that one sees when markets trend a specific way. We keep hearing that we're in for a lot of short-term volatility so just picking good stocks is no longer enough, and that utilizing a bottom-up method of selecting quality companies will no longer work in this economic environment... I found this article from Tom Bradley at the Globe and Mail really hits the nail on the head when addressing this very question. Enjoy...

Tom Bradley -The Globe and Mail 09/09/2009

I feel like I'm really up to speed right now. With the lousy weather in Ontario and Manitoba cottage country, there's been more time for reading. And while I still can't tell you what “quantitative easing” is, I've firmed up my view on all kinds of other topics.

I'm convinced that to get out of this debt crisis, we have to come up with a strategy that doesn't involve people borrowing more money. China is not the star that everyone says it is – it's easy to look good when the government is spending like a drunken sailor and the credit tap is wide open. And perhaps our first step toward a greener economy should be the better use of all the natural gas we have.

I love thinking about the big-picture stuff as much as the next investment geek, but the problem is, I don't know how I'm going to make money from it. At the end of the day, I'm still a believer that the most reliable way to add value to an indexed portfolio is to work from the bottom up. In other words, build a concentrated portfolio that doesn't look like the index, one security at a time. Each time, attempt to buy something that is worth considerably more than it trades at in the market.

But I read something this week that threw me for a loop. In his latest musing, Ira Gluskin, the soon-to-retire but never retiring president of Gluskin Sheff, was outlining why his firm is putting an increased emphasis on asset mix and had added economist, strategist and industry rock star David Rosenberg to their team. Mr. Gluskin said: “There are the holdouts who claim that they just select the best stocks around the world, regardless of industry [or country]. They are true antiques.”

“ My first reaction to his statement was one of indignation. Hmmph.”

My first reaction to his statement was one of indignation. Hmmph. Mr. Gluskin goes over to the dark side and suddenly all his old philosophical buddies are misguided and out-of-date. Relics we are!

But after I got my fragile ego back in check, I thought I'd better give Mr. Gluskin's view careful consideration, because he is one of the leading thinkers and thought provokers on Bay Street, and was writing great stuff when Mr. Rosenberg was still in school. He is of the view that short-term volatility will be with us for a while and just picking good stocks is not enough. “We wanted better strategic advice on where events are heading.”

Let's take a step back. In reality, investing involves a combination of the “bottom up” and “top down” approaches. Even pure stock pickers have a general awareness of the overall business environment when they're doing their company research and valuation work. And after the macro investors choose their direction, they still have to select securities to execute their strategies (unless they're indexing).

Nevertheless, the approaches are profoundly different. The “high elevation” investors focus on economics and broad market factors, including valuation. Their big-picture conclusions determine which sectors and/or countries they will invest in. The security selection falls out of the macro work.

That's opposed to the managers skulking along the bottom (dare I say dinosaurs), who let their fundamental analysis and valuation work determine when to buy, hold or sell a stock. The country and industry weightings in their portfolios are the result of where they find the most undervalued stocks.

Too often other issues get mixed in with the top-versus-bottom discussion, specifically the merits of “buy and hold” strategies and the importance of asset mix. That's unfortunate. Equating bottom-up to “buy and hold” is just not appropriate. Certainly some stock pickers have low turnover, but others actively trade their portfolios. Top-downers vary greatly on this measure as well.

As for asset mix (stocks versus bonds versus cash), neither side will dispute that getting the strategic or long-term mix right is the most important thing an investor does. Where the big gulf between the enlightened and the prehistoric lies is in how actively that mix is managed, and how far they are willing to stray from the long-term targets to pursue shorter-term tactics. It's in most top-downers' DNA to be more active and make bigger bets, which prompts a number of questions. Is it possible, with the likes of Mr. Rosenberg, Jeff Rubin or Patti Croft at my side, to get it right consistently enough to add value? Does all that work lead to too much tinkering? Will it distract me from finding undervalued securities and prevent me from buying them? And can I use my budget for risk more effectively elsewhere in the portfolio?

I'll keep noodling on the issue since, in my experience, ignoring what Mr. Gluskin says is usually at one's peril. In the meantime, my fellow antiques and I will continue to make sure our clients' strategic asset mix fits with their objectives. We'll devote most of our resources to finding undervalued bonds and stocks. And we'll try to get the big picture by watching long-term term trends and ignoring anything to do with the next three months.

Cheers.

Monday, August 24, 2009

7 Top Ways Millionaires Become Wealthy - Courtesy of Steven Mattos


There are 7 common factors to those who build net fortunes of one million dollars or more. In America, there has never been more personal wealth than there is today; yet most Americans are not wealthy. Amazingly, a mere 3.5% of households own almost one-half of the wealth in the United States! Although we may be hard working, educated, moderate to high-income earners, why are so few of us affluent?

In studying the affluent, I found a pattern that the wealthy follow. It is more often the result of planning, hard work, perseverance, and self-discipline that determines who become wealthy. The factors compiled here are summarized from the research done by Thomas Stanley Ph.D. on over 1100 actual millionaires (many are multi-millionaires) in the U.S. today.

1) Live Well Below Your Means
Don't be fooled. The ‘average' millionaire doesn't look like a millionaire! The key word here is frugal, frugal, and frugal. The typical person is America is a consumptionist. It's in our blood. We work hard, make money, and spend it well. Not the typical millionaire! They play great defense (saving and investing) as well as offense (making money). Just like in football -- great offense is exciting…but great defense wins games. An interesting note: Millionaires on average claimed their spouses were as frugal or more than they were. It's a family affair: Sacrifice high consumption today, for financial freedom tomorrow.

2) Spend Your Time, Energy, and Money in Ways that Build Wealth
Although the road to Millionaire's Ville takes a frugal path, they pay well for training and advice. Do investment planning. Go to seminars. Hire good attorneys, tax accountants, mentors and coaches. Learn to identify and invest in assets that produce income. The wealthy spend money when the investment will protect and grow their assets. Millionaires also know the details: How much is spent each month and on food, clothing, and shelter. The non-wealthy say they don't have time to plan, while the wealthy make time to plan. But here's the shocker: The average millionaire spends 8.5 hours per month planning, while the non-affluent spend 4.5 hours or less planning. How can 4 more hours per week impact your future? Make it happen and the odds are in your favor of joining the truly wealthy!

3) Choose Financial Independence over Displaying High Social Status
The wealthy run highly efficient operations both in business and at home. Most live in average neighborhoods, and drive average cars. They're not interested in keeping up with the Jones' -- because the Jones' aren't financially free. It takes lots of energy to consume big mortgages, change homes every few years, buy the most recent model cars, and wear the latest fashions. The wealthy drive typically American made cars! Japanese cars come in 2nd place; half of these are Toyota Camry's. Yes, significant value per dollar is the key here. The Millionaire's Motto: You aren't what you drive. The status cars -- Lexus, BMW's, Mercedes? At 6.4% or less per each brand.

4) Don't Accept Economic Support from Your Parents once Outside the Home
Sounds painful doesn't it? It's a fact that has taught the wealthy how to earn, keep, and invest money. Parents of the wealthy do not, or cannot, provide "economic outpatient care". The results are clear: The more dollars the adult children receive, the fewer they accumulate. Those who are given less are motivated to accumulate more on their own merits. An amazing fact: 80% of millionaires are first generation millionaires; they have made their money on their own, in their lifetime. Many of these folks have been immigrants to the U.S., starting out with minimal cash on hand. Work hard to learn and generate wealth--it CAN be done, and happens in America every day.

5) Teach your children to be economically self-sufficient to foster a "Wealth Mind-Set"
Provide your children fish and they will eat for a day. Teach them to fish and they will eat for a lifetime. As you might guess, children who grew up to be affluent, who had affluent parents, were taught to be disciplined and intentional with their money. Robert Kyosaki, author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, didn't cave in when his son asked for a car at 16 years old, even when the neighbor kids were being given cars by their parents. He gave his son $3000, and a subscription to the Wall Street Journal, and a few books on investing in the stock market. Now Rich Dad's son watches more CNN than MTV. He has the motivation, and is getting an education that will provide him for a lifetime, well beyond his first car purchase.

6) Become Proficient in Targeting Market Opportunities
Find your niche, like the wealthy do. Follow where the money flows, and look for specialized opportunities. Why not target the wealthy themselves? Yes, they are frugal, especially first generation self-made wealthy. BUT…they spend openly on investing in themselves and their families. Investment advice and services, business training, software, tax advice, legal, medical, dental, health, real estate, and education are top priorities. They pay well for products and services that protect and grow their assets. Remember the majority of the wealthy are self-employed entrepreneurs. Followed by medical professionals and business executives.

7) Choose the Right Occupation
You now have a good idea of what the affluent do. 20% are retirees. Of the remaining 80%, most of these are self-made businessmen and women. Keep in mind that entrepreneurs are 4 times more likely to become millionaires than those who work for others. There is no one business, or group of business more likely to breed millionaire-hood. Some are lecturers, others medical professionals, farmers, small manufacturers, and corner mom and pop stores. The most important predictor is the characteristics of the owner, than the type of business. It's the winning combination of skills and attitude that hits the wealth target.

NOTE: The affluent attribute being honest with all people as the most important characteristic in their businesses, tied with being well disciplined. The vast majority of the wealthy were not stellar students, or born into money. They have made it through following a few simple principles and being consistent.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

TEACH YOUR CHILDREN WELL OR ATLAS WILL SHRUG. (Courtesy of The Gartman Letter)


Crosby, Stills and Nash told us that we’ve no choice but to teach our children well, and it is very, very hard to argue with that statement for who wants to teach their children poorly.

But sometimes they learn lessons for themselves, and a friend of ours sent us the following short story about a lesson concerning the US drift into socialism learned on their own by his two sons. Our friend wrote:

On the way home from summer vacation, my two sons (four and eight years old) were talking about staging a lemonade stand when they got home. The four year old who spends every penny he gets suggested that he should keep all the profits because his brother (who saves every penny) has a lot more money. As a lesson in behavioral finance I suggested that it sounded like a good idea. The eight year old then said the four year old can do it himself and he would not participate.

It does not get much simpler than this to see why socialism does not work.

ScottEbeling
CommodityTrader
Chicago, IL


Scott wrote later, after we’d asked if we could reproduce this wonderfully simple yet forceful story for our clients, that “You should have seen my [eight year old son… he was kickin’ and screaming, but eventually our taxes will get to a point where it is not worth the risk to put capital and effort into starting businesses and creating jobs, we will choose just to not participate.”

We are collectively near to the point of this eight year old boy’s anger and dismay over his four year old brother’s illogical demands, for we are being asked to pay huge and rising taxes to support those who chose not to work and we wish not to do so.

We’ve a responsibility to those who cannot work and for those to whom life has dealt a very bad hand. We have obligations to the infirm and the ill-treated, and we take those obligations very, very seriously, for we give graciously and willingly to charities of all kinds and at most times.

However we are not prepared, nor do we intend, to sponsor the “four year olds” who envy what we or others have made and think it is theirs to be taken from us. Obama and the Left are teaching our young an ill advised lesson that those who are wealthy owe money… large sums of money… to those who are not, but even eight year olds know a scam when they see one.

(Dennis Gartman - The Gartman Letter - Aug 05, 09)

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

El Nino... (Investment Opp?)


Not that I really want to become a weather forecaster, but one of the things that commodity funds keep a close eye on, and I do too, is El Nino/La Nina events and their impact on commodity supply, prices and related equity performance.

Over the past few months there have been signs of a developing El Nino event in the Pacific and this could have important implications for supply and prices for several commodities over the next 12-18 months. The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration expects the current event to last throughout the Northern Hemisphere winter and into 2010.

What is El Nino? It is an abnormal warming of surface ocean waters in the eastern Pacific which causes an oscillation of pressure patterns impacting weather conditions.

What are El Nino impacts?

• Reduction in rainfall in eastern and northern Australia, as well as parts of South East Asia causing drought conditions. A strong El Nino could result in drought in India, Indonesia and Malaysia. Very hot summer weather in northern China, flooding in southern China.

• Warmer winters in the northern part of North America and cooler in the southern parts. Wetter summers in the intermountain regions of the US. Depressed hurricane activity in the Gulf of Mexico.

• Warm and wet summers in western parts of Latin America (Peru and Ecuador) likely causing flooding. Higher winter rainfall in Chile. Dryer and hotter weather in the Amazon, Colombia and Central America with wetter spring and summer conditions in southern Brazil and northern Argentina.

Why is this relevant to commodities?

El Nino/La Nina trends generally impact supply of commodities, be that oil and gas, coal, wheat, soybeans, rice, etc

What are potential commodity impacts?

Oil & gas: El Nino generally results in depressed GoM hurricane activity which could mean limited supply curtailments this hurricane season, keeping gas prices depressed if demand doesn’t pick up.

Wheat: The last two major El-Nino events have resulted in significant increases in wheat prices during and after the event. This has come in no small measure due to impact of drought conditions in Australia on wheat production and yields.

Soybean: The last two major El-Nino events have resulted in significant increases in wheat prices during and after the event. Brazilian and Argentinean production of soybean has been impacted by drought and flooding in previous events.

Rice: The last three major El-Nino events have resulted in increases in rice prices during and after the event. Chinese and Indian rice production may be impacted by an El Nino event.

Monday, July 13, 2009

A Great Answer To A Great Question.


There seems to be something wrong with the way oil is trading these days -- at least wrong if you believe it should trade based on supply and demand. Obviously, the fundamentals aren't changing as fast as the wild price swings. Much of this seems to be because the trading pits are dominated by trades of paper (financial) barrels of oil and not real barrels of oil.

Yet, you seem to be generally opposed to limitations on oil speculation. Why? And is the current method of pricing oil the best one we can come up with? Can't we come up with a better system? When I go to the store to buy other goods, the price doesn't fluctuate so wildly. Why do we have to price oil this way?

Stephen Schork (The Globe & Mail 13/07/09): I certainly agree that oil speculators impact the pricing of oil (and other commodities) in the short-run. Therefore, at times the price path does indeed decouple from the underlying fundamentals. However, in the long-run, markets will regress to the fundamentals. hence the Wall Street adage. markets fall faster than they rise.

I do favor certain new regs on speculative trading in commodities. For instance, there is a tremendous amount of derivative contracts linked to U.S. markets that are traded on the ICE exchange in London that do not come under the purview of U.S. regulators. For price transparency reasons I think that ought to change.

On the other hand, I do not like the idea of limiting oil speculation. Why?

The most important reason is that speculators provide an outlet for producers to sell risk. If you hamper the speculators ability to buy that risk then all you are really doing is forcing this systemic risk back onto the books of the producers.

Therefore, they will in turn become apprehensive when it comes to increasing their risk exposure to the market, i.e. it will retard their ability to increase their plant and equipment or said another way. it will hamper their ability to increase supply when demand warrants.

Thus, in the long-run, limiting speculation might decreased short-run volatility in the market. But it will only serve to increase it for all of us in the long run.

Monday, June 29, 2009

So... Where are we again?

June has come to pass with the swift speed that only Father Time could attain, and here we are still watching as the tumultuous markets work through their innate differences in a most vexing fashion. The famous "sell in May and go away" adage did not apply, and as we look back from our semi-annual perch piecing together the sparse similarities of historical precedence to some how map our way in an effort to gain some long-desired foresight, we need not be afraid. For the markets ALWAYS have this stubbornly magical, yet preordained habit of moving from the lower-left to the upper-right. From morning to noon and into the night... (*This rhyme is best served with a recent Andex chart. Feel free to scroll down to a recent post of mine in which you will find a wonderful reminder of what markets tend to do)

Asset selection is very very important from this point going forward. Easy to say, difficult to apply. There are many different theories on what a portfolio should look like... How to "learn from this one and finally build something that will guarantee principle value retention." It seems to me that all of these sudden preservation and V&L shaped recovery strategies are an explosive way to market a short-term reaction to the problem. Whereas, I am really interested as to what those select few who have stayed to their original investment policy in the face of adversity are up to. As they tend to be the ones skating to where the puck will be, where the rest of those "reactionaries" are busy adjusting course to where the puck is going.

People tend to chase performance by selecting investments that outperformed over the last 1,3, and 5 years. The best thing you can do for your current portfolio is to look at what you own today, and decide if its what you want to own tomorrow. Think about your future…

Moving on to a side-note.

In 2008, for the first time in human history, the majority of the world’s people lived in cities. And cities for the foreseeable future will continue to grow faster than the countrysides surrounding them. Globally, the number of people living in cities of 1 million or more will grow from about half a billion in 1975 to almost 2 billion in 2025. As a result, cities have assumed a central role in the urbanized world of the 21st century. They are wielding more economic power, developing greater political influence and increasingly employing more advanced technological capabilities to enhance their operations... This is an absolute and finite and indisputable reason why Globally competitive markets will continue their march from these lows. The continued urbanization of exisiting economic powerhouses, along with the creation of a middle-class in developing countries, will put a strain on supply and add to the demand for natural resources, services, and pretty much all industries across the board.

So, if the words of financial Armageddon have not pierced your heart and left you frozen in a state of asset-shock, then where do we begin? What story do you believe in? Look into your own portfolio and ask yourself these 2 questions:

- What investments do you want to own in the next 1,3, and 5 years?

- What are you concerned about for the next 1,3, and 5 years?

Alternative Energy? ♦ Municipal Bonds? ♦ Gold? ♦ Social Security going bust? ♦ Inflation running rampant? ♦ Deflation? ♦ Oil? ♦ Taxes going up? ♦ Monthly income? ♦ The dollar?

As the old guy next to me used to say: "A car could look sporty, but if it don't got it under the hood, then all that exterior jazz will just get blown off when the race starts..." So to should a portfolio need to have the best underlying story driving all the other parts, to not only finish the race, but to win the darn thing. It's the least you could do for yourself. Honest.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

You're not as smart as you think you are... Investing Wisdoms.


The following is from an email a colleague sent to me. It has great rhyme and reason, and I feel it is a great reminder for anyone who invests in the stock market.

Our emotions are our biggest enemy, at least when it comes to investing. We should all know this. If you don’t, stop making your own investment decisions right now.

Our emotions lead us to do the opposite of what we should be doing. They lead us to buy high and sell low. They make us excited when we should be scared, and scared when we should be excited. They make us slaves to the stock market; they let the market become our master.

The market is there to serve us, and not the other way around. It is okay to have emotions; we’re human, after all. But what we really need is an investment process. This is system of rules that we follow that keeps emotion in check.

Now, I hate republishing old articles. But a few, the ones that focus on the process, I’ll recycle (and improve upon) for a long, long time. I wrote the following article, in 2007. I included it in my book. I’ve shared it with readers in the past. And I even wrote the flip side of it in October 2008, addressing the impact of a cyclical bear market on out psyche by cyclical bear market.

I’m not offering it now to provide a hidden message that I think the current (cyclical) bull market is over. I don’t know that. I just want to remind you (and me) that a rising market has an impact on our psyche, our analysis and our decisions, and we need to be aware of it.

You are not as smart as you think you are; psychotherapy for (cyclical) bull markets
Lately I’ve been getting this powerful feeling that everything I touch turns to gold. Every time I buy a stock, it goes up. Did I finally figure out the stock market game? Did I find a secret way to follow Will Rogers’ advice: Buy stocks that go up, and if they don’t go up, don’t buy them.

No, I didn’t get much smarter, and my stock-picking skills haven’t improved that much over the past year. I was simply a willing participant in the latest (cyclical) bull market. A bull market makes you feel smarter than you are the same way a bear market makes you feel dumber than you are.

Feeling smart makes you do the opposite of what you should be doing. The euphoria of the golden touch is a dangerous thing because it can make us careless. We forget about risk since we haven’t seen it in a while and focus only on the rewards. You have to actively make yourself aware of the four-letter word R-I-S-K!
How do you do that? My favorite way is to remind myself how dumb I am. I pull out an annual return report of a company on which I lost a boatload of money and masochistically try to read it from cover to cover, reliving my errors.

We all have these stocks, the ones we lost a lot of money in because we were overconfident. We tend to forget about them during a bull market. But I suggest you remember them now, so you’ll have fewer of those names to remember in the future. Risk is still there; it is just hiding under the joyful sentiment of the bull market.
Believe me, it will show its ugly face. It is just a matter of time.

Discipline counts

In a bull market, it is easy to forget about selling discipline and then turn into a “buy and forget to sell” investor. Every time you sell a stock, you look dumb because it usually goes up afterward.

I recently sold several stocks. Shamelessly, paying absolutely no attention to the fact that I sold them, they went higher. I don’t feel smart about those sell decisions. However, when I bought those stocks, I set valuation targets. When they approached the targets, I quickly reviewed their fundamentals. They had not changed much. The decision was obvious — sell.

Cyclical bull markets teach us not to sell, while cyclical bear markets teach us not to buy. If you let the market tell you what to do, you have no process.
But the bell doesn’t ring when bull or bear markets are over.

You cannot worry about marking the “top” in every sell. My objective is not to buy at the “bottom” and sell at the “top.” My objective is to buy a great company when it is cheap and to sell it when it is fairly valued! I suggest you do the same.

-Courtessy of Vitaliy Katsenelson.

Friday, May 29, 2009

To Benefit From The Knowledge Of Historical Trends.


There is a firm belief that the following is happening (or will happen) in connection with the current economic stimuli being applied to the global economy. I feel it is necessary to look into what the real effects of this stimulus are, without speculation or political suggestion driving ones conclusions:

1. Central banks worldwide are flooding the global economy with liquidity to stave off deflation and stimulate economic activity. This is particularly true of the United States, which is central to the global economy.

2. This monetary policy will result in a significant increase of M2 (typically viewed as the total currency in circulation, deposits and money market instruments or other cash equivalents), which will debase currencies, but in particular the U.S. dollar.

3. The price of gold will increase, anticipating the effect of the M2 increase and inflation.

4. The price of energy will increase, being an essential input of an inflating economy.

5. A more broad-based economic recovery will then begin resulting in a rise in share prices world-wide.

6. Insurance companies, which are more levered to the stock market (compared with banks)as a result of, among other things providing guaranteed returns on variable annuity products, will benefit next as their capital position backing those policies grows in connection with rising share prices.

7. Credit conditions will improve, lifting the prospects of banks globally.

*Current actions taken by governments around the world are designed to create an inflationary effect in the global economy, stimulating economic output and consumer spending.

*Historically, industrial output contraction has been followed by significant output increases which have driven economic growth and market returns.

Asset Allocation Designed To Benefit From An Economic Recovery:
Certain sectors and companies will benefit earlier and more substantially than others in the event of a market recovery. And it's within these names that you will find the greatest value and successes in rebuilding your portfolio holdings over the next 5 years and beyond. Once again, tactical, active management is needed now more than ever before.

(Due to licensing constraints, I will not be listing the individual names of companies I am following, but send me an email if you would like to hear more.)

Regards.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Bubbles To Recovery...


I sat with a senior advisor and partner at my firm last week. The topic of the conversation was "bubbles", and the usual action/reaction process that takes place when they "pop". He was an advisor back in the 1970's, and he's quite astute when it comes to this particular subject. (This is also proven through his uncanny ability to miss each bubble-bursting that his taken place since... I.E. Dot Com, 9-11, LTCM, etc...)

Firstly there is a predictable behavior when bubbles reach their peak... That is, no matter who you are, whether you are a novice or an investment professional, the story ALWAYS sounds good and convincing. For example: In the dot-com bubble, anything "tech" related was a great story. "This company specializes in this", and so on... Eventually, everyone starts to see it as a very compelling idea. It is a trick on our emotional nature that, even though our rational minds are telling us: "OK, this company is run by two college kids, went public last week, no proven revenue, but is located in California and specializes in something computer related... This is crazy to even consider, BUT, Greg my neighbor has made 200% so far... And the technology they are developing is cutting-edge as they say... I'll do it! Sell the tractor, back up the truck!!!"

Bubbles:
They start as a reasonable, but unproven idea at a reasonable price.
They end as a sound proven idea, but at an unreasonable price.


Sound familiar? Look at the "potash" story. Great story. Feeding off of the "world food glut" problem. It also fits in nicely to the China and India story, whereby, China has the largest population in the World, and has a quickly developing middle-class who will demand higher grades of protein (beef, chicken, etc...) Imagine the economics that goes in to matching this increase in demand. It blows your mind. So, the developed world gets wind of this and follows the supply chain right back down to agriculture and of course the fertilizer companies. POW. You have a small fert company in rural Saskatchewan that suddenly becomes a heavy-hitter on the world stage, and a very large weighting on the Canadian Stock Exchange. (Eerily familiar to what Nortel did during the dot-com era... Look at Nortel now. Once worth a few hundred dollars per share, now in the pennies.)

Of course times are different now, and China hasn't even begun to wake from it's long slumber, so the story remains strong. (But, that doesn't mean we wont see future bubbles forming in this sector. We just have to be much more active in how we manage our investments. Passivity will surly lead to personal destruction in this new and interesting economic environment.)

After the recent "correction" we've experienced in the markets around the globe, the number one focus should be on recovery. The 5 year plan... Probably the most important 5 years your assets will experience for a life time. Let's look at 2 possible recoveries and the conditions that need to be met to succeed:


V-shaped Recovery:

“When a downturn in growth is followed by steep upturn”

Historical Precedence:
Zarnowitz Rule: Deep recessions are almost always followed by steep recoveries.
This was exhibited over the last four recessions. The shallower than average recessions of the early 2000’s and 1990’s were followed by shallower than average recoveries. The deep recessions of the early 1980’s and 1970’s were followed by steep recoveries.

Conditions needed for a V-Shaped Recovery:
Sustained recovery in U.S. consumer spending, including housing, autos and other durable goods with no significant increase in household savings. Significant Government spending and investment stretched out over several years. Significant increases in private investment. Strong export growth resumes, trade deficit shrinks further.


L-shaped (sideways) Recovery:

“When a steep downturn in growth is followed by several years of sluggish recovery”

Historical Precedence:
Financial & Global Recessions: An IMF study found that recessions caused by financial crises tend to be followed by slow recoveries. Similarly, recoveries from globally synchronized recessions are generally weak. After Japan’s real estate and stock market bubble burst in the 1990, its financial system was crippled. Economic growth averaged 0.5% over the next 10 years. This was dubbed the “lost decade".

Conditions needed for an L-Shaped Recovery:
Very sluggish recovery in U.S. consumer spending with a significant increase in household savings. Significant Government spending and investment stretched out over several years. Modest increases in private investment. Export growth resumes and trade deficit stabilizes.


Be Proactive Regardless of What You Expect from the Market:
What performed best going into the bottom will not likely perform the best coming out of it. Make sure you are comfortable with your asset allocation and security/fund selection. AND, if the story of something becomes too convincing, take a step back, maybe some profits as well, and watch for the inevitable bubble to grow and burst. With "preservation" being a key element to ones retirement future, having a bullish yet contrarian mind to these things may prove vital to your recovery. 'Luck.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Lets Talk Economy............. (Shall we?)


The Sky Is Falling....

It must be true. It’s in the newspapers, on TV and the radio. The economy is in trouble. Stocks, mortgages, banks, insurance companies. All falling and/or failing.

But, falling from where? The biggest economic boom of all time? The biggest housing boom of all time? The easiest loan requirements of all time?

Business is not down, it’s just different. The media, with their mysterious ways of relaying half-truths and impartial information, have impressed upon us to graciously "miss the point", thanks in part to the number 1 controller of our actions: Fear.

For example, when you hear the negative statistic on the news that home sales are down 33%, it actually means that FIVE MILLION homes will be sold this year. The only unanswered question is: Who will get that business? The media portrays gloom when actually there’s still PLENTY of opportunity – just not as much as before.

The low hanging fruit of two years ago is now much higher in the trees.

There’s plenty of business in the marketplace – just not as much as there was during what was the biggest housing and economic boom of all time. As a result, businesses are adjusting to current market conditions. (And this is especially reflected in the stock market, which has been and will always be the leading indicator of commerce... Investors should take heed.)

Since no one can predict the future, and the economic growth or slowdown answers are not yet apparent, senior management must react to present-day situations. Finding those who are doing so should be a primary focus of investment strategy going forward... Survival of the Fittest! and all that jazz...

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

An Interesting Reflection...


CAPITALISM STILL LIGHTS THE WORLD:

Sometimes images we see pass across our desk make cases for arguments far more perfectly and far more swiftly than any sum of words may or shall. One such is the “map” of the world compiled by amateur astronomers from pictures take from high
above the earth of the earth “at night”. We’ve included that “map” here this morning for the case is made that only the capitalist nations of the world are alight! One can see the US, Europe, Canada, Japan, the large cities of the coastlines of Australia, the lights of New Zealand, the major cities of S. America et al. One is even shocked by the “light” from India, and perhaps most fascinating, Israel stands out rather archly from the rest of the Middle East.

And then one sees the darkness that is most of Africa other than S.Africa and parts of Nigeria in the west. One sees the darkness of the Middle East. One sees the darkness of the “stans” in Central Asia…and one sees the utter and complete darkness that is the People’s Paradise of N. Korea. It is there, made evident by its complete and utter darkness.

(Co Of: Dennis Gartman - 04/28/09)

Monday, April 13, 2009

A Most Insightful Idea... (Courtesy of Brian Tracy)


I felt the following is a great topic regarding the current state of the markets and economy in the US... Great because it is generally looking at a "solution", and not just the "problem". A refreshing read to say the least. (Posted by Brian Tracy on Mar 25, 2009)

There is good news and bad news in our economy today. First, the bad news: We are immersed in the worst economic situation of our lifetimes. As a nation, we have been on a spending binge for decades, spending money that we have not earned on things that we could not afford, and on terms that we could not pay for, to impress people that we don’t care about that much in any case.

Now, it’s all over. As Stein’s Law says, “What can not go on indefinitely, won’t go on indefinitely.”

After several decades of affluence, Americans fell in love with the idea that they were entitled to have the highest standard of living in the world while working at half-speed, wheeling and dealing, flipping properties and generally trying to “get-rich-quick.” Now, it’s all over, and it’s not coming back. We are living in a new reality.

The good news is that the US economy is still the most entrepreneurial in the world. Americans start more businesses per capita, register more patents and copyrights, create more breakthroughs in every field, graduate more students, and are simultaneously more positive and optimistic about the future than people in any other country.

The key to reversing our negative economic situation is for the federal government to allow the business community to “take off the gloves” and begin investing, producing and creating new wealth and new jobs.

The current federal bail-outs and massive spending plans are imposing a huge financial burden on our children and grandchildren. The latest estimate is that each person in America has been saddled with an additional $48,000 in debt that they will have to pay off out of their paychecks and through their taxes in the years ahead. The tragedy is that virtually none of this big spending will do anything to stimulate job and wealth creation.

Almost every dollar has been allocated to pet programs, give-aways, earmarks, pork belly projects, and social welfare. None of the money invested in these areas will create any real jobs. And most of the spending doesn’t start until 2010 and beyond.

Government has no money. The only money government has is the money that it takes away from the private sector, and from individual taxpayers. Government creates no wealth. It merely redistributes wealth away from the people who earn it toward the government sector.

For every job that government creates, it must destroy approximately 1.4 jobs in the private sector.

Government jobs are those jobs that, by definition, nobody is willing to pay for because nobody values the results or outcome of those jobs.

Jobs in the private sector only arise when people produce products and services that people want and are willing to pay for.

The current administration seems to be obsessed with taxing the successful and productive people in America. These people are also the only real “job creators” in America. If you want to create more jobs, reward the people who create more jobs.

There is a simple solution to the current economic situation: abolish corporate income taxes. Abolish capital gains taxes. Abolish taxes on dividends.

Instead of taxing productive people so heavily that they have no money or incentives to invest and create jobs, remove these tax burdens completely.

The result would be a complete turnaround of the US stock market. Companies and their stocks would increase in value overnight. The monies lost in 401(K) plans would be largely recovered and recouped, thereby saving the retirements and dreams of millions of Americans.

Companies do not pay taxes anyway. Companies only collect taxes from their customers, or reduce the wages that they pay to their employees, and pass them on to the government.

Today, very few companies are earning any profits so eliminating taxes on those profits would cost the government almost nothing. On the other hand, it would signal to America, Americans, and the rest of the world that the US is now the most attractive country in the world to start businesses, and to invest and create wealth. The natural energy, ambition and determination of the American people can and will bring us rapidly out of this recession if entrepreneurs, businesses people, investors and wealth-creators are simply encouraged to “take off the gloves.”

Brian Tracy

(I recommend his website to any who are looking for inspirational ideas and insightful opinions: www.briantracy.com)

Monday, April 6, 2009

April... Bear or Bull Rally? Promising Thoughts.


(Please click on the above picture to get a clearer view... It details what, as investors, we should all be focused on... The main reason why staying invested in a portfolio of good quality companies is paramount to capturing this once in a life time opportunity.)

A quick blurb on Professional Active Management:

We're entering a great time for those of us who believe in active management. We will have the opportunity to acquire great businesses at historically low valuations. Mr. Buffett made his career from 1973 to 1975 because at that time picking grossly undervalued businesses was like shooting fish in a barrel. (OF course, this time the barrel is much larger, and finding the highest quality fish that much trickier.)
Successful investing through this near-term market volatility calls for tactical asset management. As the pace of creative destruction accelerates, it's important to own industry leaders with very strong balance sheets: The strong will get stronger, the weak will get weaker.

Pertinent Closing Thoughts (Bill Gross)

In a sense, we are all children of the bull market, although some of us are more mature than others – a bull market of free-enterprise productivity and innovation, yes, but one fostered by a bull market in leverage, deregulation and globalization that proved unsustainable in its excesses. We now must view ourselves as chastened adults, forced into acknowledging a new reality that is dependent upon bear-market delevering and debt liquidation to deliver us to our new and ultimate restructured destination – wherever it lies. Thus, while historians might describe these years as an evolution, for those of us living it day-by-day it most assuredly has the feel of a revolution. Much like Irving Fisher’s “permanently higher plateau” of prosperity that was quickly turned on its head in 1929, those who would forecast a “permanently lower valley” of despair might similarly be off the mark. Yet there should be no doubt that the bull markets as we’ve known them are over and that the revolution is on. Investing is no longer child’s play.

Friday, March 20, 2009

Behavioural finance offers path to market recovery.

Investors could be willing to take on more risk to recoup their losses.

Behavioural finance theories are gaining prominence and could plausibly explain the wild market volatility of recent months, according to Jan Mahrt-Smith, an associate professor of finance at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management.

Speaking at the University of Toronto on Tuesday, Mahrt-Smith pointed out that behavioural finance has recently gained much more attention as financial experts and commentators seek to explain the dramatic market activity of recent months.

“Behavioural finance is everywhere these days,” said Mahrt-Smith, who is also co-director of the Rotman Master of Finance Program.

One of the roles of behavioural finance, which is the study of non-rational decision-making and the ways such decisions impact financial markets, is to fill in the gaps of rational finance theories, Mahrt-Smith explained. For instance, behavioural finance acknowledges that investors have different expectations about investments, and that changes in investor confidence levels can impact the markets. In addition, the theory shows that emotions can play a role in investing.

Certain irrational investment behaviours could have played a role in adding to the market volatility of recent months. For instance, Mahrt-Smith pointed to studies showing that investors tend to focus more on gains and losses than their overall level of wealth.

“It should be only wealth matters,” he said. “But it turns out we care about gaining money or losing money much more.”

Whether a loss is big or small, it can have a significant impact on a person’s happiness, he added.

“One dollar gain is a gain, it’s fantastic. One dollar loss is a loss and it’s horrible,” Mahrt-Smith said.

The losses incurred by investors early in the downturn, therefore, could have helped trigger an irrational panicked reaction that led to a more severe selloff and added momentum to the downturn.

Some of the investment losses of recent months could also have been worsened by the tendency for investors to hold on to losing stocks longer than winning stocks -- a reality of investment behaviour, according to Mahrt-Smith.

“We’re willing to gamble that it will come back up, but we don’t want to take the loss,” he said.

He added that the recent crash could change investors’ behaviour going forward.

“We’re all poorer now, so we have to recalibrate how we think going forward,” he said. “Maybe using historical statistics isn’t going to be the same when you’re going through a period of a crash or a bubble.”

In particular, Mahrt-Smith said that even though nearly all investors have lost money in recent months, behavioural finance theory shows that they could be willing to take on more risk to recoup their losses.

“We’re going to behave quite differently from these risk-averse, rational investors,” he said. “People are going to gamble for a resurrection.”

Mahrt-Smith noted that there are some considerable arguments against using behavioural finance theories to explain the current market events. For instance, some argue that since all investors tend to behave differently, it is difficult to draw generalized conclusions about this behaviour.

Still, Mahrt-Smith said the theories represent a promising starting point for justifying some of the ways investor behaviour has played into the widespread market volatility of recent months.

(-Courtesy of: "Investment Executive - 03/18/09 Article by Megan Harman.)

Thursday, March 12, 2009

What amazing times these are...


“Be careful what you water your dreams with. Water them with worry and fear and you produce weeds that choke the life from your dreams… Always be on the lookout for ways to turn a problem in to an opportunity for success.” -Lao Tzu

"Bear-Market... Shmear-Market..."

The near term will likely remain volatile, but I continue to believe periods like these create long-term opportunity... We must however navigate wisely.

We will look back on this period as one that provided fantastic entry points for long-term oriented investors.

If you are a value investor- you are a long-term investor. If you are a long-term investor- you accept in advance that you are making no effort whatsoever to keep up with your benchmark or peers on a short-term basis.

Reasons to consider investing today:

-Contrarian Sentiment: Buy when there is blood in the streets. While the current crisis has created mass fear and panic, it has also created opportune entry points for long-term investors.

-Cheap Stocks: Current S&P 500 valuations imply an extended period of extraordinarily- and unlikely- weak long-term earnings growth.

-Government Action: The U.S. Government- and others- is making an extraordinarily proactive effort to address current problems.

-Growth on Tap: While the economic global engines of growth (e.g. China, Brazil, India) have slowed, they are not broken.

-Parked Wealth: Nearly $4 trillion are currently sitting in money market funds.

-Historical Precedent: Equities have delivered 9% to 11% annualized returns in the more than eight decades through 2007... decades that include the Great Depression, World War 2, the Long-Term Capital Debacle, the Asian Contagion, Iraq Wars 1 and 2 and September 11Th.

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Addition To The Corporate Bond Post... (From Warren Buffett's Recent Release)

Clinging to cash equivalents or long-term government bonds at present yields is almost certainly a terrible policy if continued for long. Holders of these instruments, of course, have felt increasingly comfortable – in fact, almost smug – in following this policy as financial turmoil has mounted. They regard their judgment confirmed when they hear commentators proclaim “cash is king,” even though that wonderful cash is earning close to nothing and will surely find its purchasing power eroded over time.

Approval, though, is not the goal of investing. In fact, approval is often counter-productive because it sedates the brain and makes it less receptive to new facts or a re-examination of conclusions formed earlier.

Beware the investment activity that produces applause; the great moves are usually greeted by yawns.

Bonds... Corporate Bonds. (Sexy no?)

Safety and security is a pressing issue now-a-days; when we see even the most rational investors of our life time acting in irrational ways. But where does one focus his investments and still guarantee a great degree of protection while beating the eroding effects of inflation? If your stomach (IE. risk tolerance) is not up to the swings of high-yielding equities (IE. companies that pay handsome dividends, etc...), then bonds are the most logical place to look... or one could simply hide under a rock until the sky is done falling... Unfortunately, most of us don't have that kind of luxury, as time is something we don't have alot of. So now more than ever, investment returns are vastly important to achieve some semblance of our former retirement dreams and aspirations.

Quick Background:
Bond prices and bond yields move in opposite directions. Prices are quoted relative to a par value of 100 - a bonds value at issue. If the bond has a 5% interest coupon, the annual yield is 5%. But if investors bid down the price of the bond in the market, and you buy at say 90, the effective yield is greater than 5%. And if you hold the bond to maturity, you'll get the 100 in principal, on top of the coupon income you've received.

If you read that bond yields have increased, it means that bond prices have declined(and vice-versa). Prices for long-term corporate bonds tend to move alot, since these prices are based on Government bonds plus a spread for greater risk. A company's sales, earnings and other financials also have a big impact. Rating agencies grade bond issuers on their ability to repay (AAA, AA, B, Etc..).

In the current market one sees great opportunities, especially in midterm corporate bonds. In 2006 and 2007 spreads were very tight. Even riskier corporate bonds weren't yielding much more than Government issues. But last fall, corporate bond prices plummeted as the credit crisis worsened. Today, spreads are more rational - they're wider.

Overall it is important to hold on to the bond until maturity to be certain to make money. Even without the glamour of stocks, there's still risk - and excitement in bonds these days.

(PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINK TO MY TEAM'S WEBSITE ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THIS BLOG-PAGE TO FIND OUT MORE ON SOME OF THE GREAT DEALS ON CORPORATE BONDS. UNDER THE HEADING "PUBLICATIONS: CABA NEWSLETTERS"... CHEERS)

(Some information sourced from The Globe and Mail - R.O.B. 03/2009)

Friday, February 20, 2009

Thoughts Going Into The Weekend...


The Chinese word for crisis, Wei Ji, is a compound of the characters for Danger (Wei), and Opportunity (Ji). There is probably no better word for describing the mindset of successful investors.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Where we're at... (Brief comment from Don Coxe)

What we know from the 70s is that if you have a recession at a time of fast money supply growth that what happens is that the stock groups that tend to do best during the recession and to lead you out of the recession tend to be commodities. So the commodities stocks of course, were just hammered after the ‘midnight massacre’ of July 13, 2008 which is what really launched deflation in the world. But what’s interesting is what’s happened to them since then in relative strength. We come back to my old faithful of the IBD’s 197 industry subgroup rankings and what changes there are in that from week to week. This week, if we take the top 21 stock groups, we see that 7 of them, that is one-third of them are commodity groups led, of course, once again, by metals, ores, gold and silver; they’ve been at the top for some time. But we’ve got food flour and grain; we’ve got oil and gas transport pipeline, we’ve got oil and gas refining and marketing, I feel very good about the fact that pure refiners have done so well, I can tell you. Food, miscellaneous preparation, retail, wholesale food; and Oil and Gas, International Exploration and Production interestingly enough.

So, what that tells me is that this is the kind of swing at a time when everything looked bad, back in 1974, and by the way, things looked much worse then than they do now, in 1974. We were down to a 6 mulitple on the Dow. And the belief in equities as an asset class was being abandoned on all sides and unemployment was double digit levels and governments were falling; things were much much worse then. But, what you could see was the relative strength of the commodity groups, including, by the way, the supermarkets back then, which is interesting, because the supermarkets are doing well now. So, I would therefore like to take the view that what signals we’re getting for the market are that the market like all the pundits, isn’t sure that this $2-trillion that’s being thrown at the system is going to work. But the belief is if it does work, we’re going to have a greater demand for scarce assets, and that everybody recognizes that the huge selloff that we’ve had in commodities and commodities stocks means that scarcities could come back pretty quickly. And that’s exactly what happened in the 70s.

Now, I’m quite sure there’s a lot of you out there saying ‘you keep talking about the 70s, and its a different world.’ It is in many respects, but only in one, I think, that’s really crucial, and that is on the real estate side. Because back then what we had was the baby boomers were university graduates having to live with their parents or grandparents because there were no houses available for them. There was a housing shortage because of course, there was no way they could expand the housing market fast enough to take cognizance of the huge number of baby boomers coming out of high schools, community colleges, and universities; well we havn;t anything like that this time, because of the birth dearth that began back then. What we have is a situation where the housing supply was built on the assumption that things would be the same as they had been every other cycle and of course they aren’t the same, and they will never be the same the next 50 years. So that’s the big difference. We have demographic deflation across the industrial world and in that sense, what it means is that there is one asset class which cannot behave as it did back then. And back then, house prices, although it took them a while to start moving up, even though we had inflation, they did. In any case, you didn’t lose money on housing back then.

I think that the fact that the oil stocks, despite the fact that spot WTI has gone to a new low, the oil stocks are actually starting to perform better, is people’s recognition that with the cutbacks that OPEC has already delivered and then the evidence that US consumption hasn’t fallen by 5%, 6%, or 7% as people thought; those statistics were clouded by what the retail gasoline sales were; and of course, what they did, because retail gasoline was down by 50%, was in trying to adjust for this after you took out state taxes and all these things, people got wrong what the actual volumes there were. So what we see is that the actual demand for oil in the world has not fallen off a cliff. Yes, the demand for industrial goods and consumer goods and ? and things like that has fallen of a cliff. But certainly not for most commodities, and particularly, not for oil. And with the move that we’re getting in the fertilizers, and I’d just like to mention once again, the value of the IBD survey, because way down, you get way down the list, number 56 on the list, and you see chemicals and fertilzers [12:23] but that this week and three weeks ago they were down in the depths at 154 and the charts show you that there has been a huge change in attitude towards the fertilizers and indeed towards the agricultural stocks generally.

Now, that’s not because I think the world has embraced our view of the strong possibility that the two centuries of global warming have come to an end, and that we might be entering a period of global cooling which would dramatically affect the outlook for crops in the northern hemisphere. No, I think its simply once again the recognition that although demand is reduced somewhat for key grains and feedgrains as a result of the economic slowdown, that it has not collapsed and the carry overs even though they’re bigger than they were a year ago, are not so great as to suggest that the prices farmers are going to get for their grain are going to be profitable. Yes, spot corn is $3.66, but the new corn that hasn’t been planted yet, which will be delivered in December is $4.07, and corn for the next year after that is $4.25. These are prices, that if you’re a farmer who does a good job producing it, could make a lot of money on it, despite the collapse in demand for ethanol. So, what I’m basically saying is that we already have two commodity groups which in the last few weeks have been moving up strongly, and they’re basically saying that you don’t have to take a bet on how the Obama program works out, as to whether or not this recession is going to drag out a couple more years. You can make money here.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Nick Murray... Words of Wisdom



Stocks Vs. Bonds:

The most important thing is: did you invest relentlessly in any stock funds as opposed to any bond funds, individual bonds or CD’s. The Megatruth is: real wealth come to, and abides with, the owners of great companies, not to the lenders to great companies. I’m not suggesting that an owner can’t lose; I’m declaring as an article of faith that a loaner can’t win.

If you steadily accumulate even mundane stocks month after month and year after year, if you patiently remain true to your tortoise disciplines even when hares go whizzing past you left and right, and above all if you regard “bear markets” as opportunities to buy more of your stocks at sale prices rather than as the onset of Armageddon – you’ll not only achieve wealth, you’ll probably “outperform” 90% of your fellow investors without even trying.

Thus, a huge percentage of your total lifetime return is attributable to the simple decision to be an owner and not a loaner. And most of the rest of your return depends not on how your stocks perform vs. their peers, but on how you behave. Wealth isn’t primarily determined by investment performance, but by investor behaviour.

Equities neither make you wealthy nor keep you wealthy. You have to do those things yourself. You can’t, as we’ve seen, build and hold wealth without equities. But the converse is even more importantly true: equities can’t do it without you. Your appropriate behaviour with respect to equity investments – and not the relative “performance” of those investments – is the variable that will govern your financial success. (And in the end, your behaviour is the only thing you can ever really control.)
The single most important variable in the quest for equity investment success is also the only variable you ultimately control: you own behaviour.

Four Behavioural Tactics to Success:
1. Setting goals in dollar-specific, date- specific terms.
2. Establishing a plan for achieving those goals, assuming a specific rate (or rates) of return.
3. Investing the same dollar amounts at regular intervals, so as to harness the power of dollar-cost averaging.
4. Meeting your retirement income needs via systematic withdrawal from your equity portfolio.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Short-term Numbers. (Think Beyond)

Just as in every boom the bulls proclaim that “this time is different” — that the markets are fundamentally more stable than ever before — so in every slump, the pessimists insist that the world faces unprecedented disaster and that, just this time, the recession will not be followed by recovery as it always has before.

The cause of the current economic misery is an unprecedented credit crunch. But against these deflationary pressures there are equally unprecedented expansionary forces: the lowest interest rates in history; the fastest-ever fall in oil and commodity prices; the biggest-ever peace-time public works programmes; and, most importantly, a willingness and ability by governments and central banks to support their financial systems.

This crisis has therefore become a tug-of-war between two extraordinary forces. So what can we say about the outcome of this elemental battle?

We can only say one thing for certain: that no economist will accurately forecast the numerical result. However a reading of the major economic thinkers — Schumpeter, Hayek, Keynes, etc. — can remind us that in one way or another, the profit motive will ultimately triumph.

Monday, January 26, 2009

Bottom Line.....

(1987 VS. Present)



You will regret not owning equities over your investment lifetime. You will regret even more if you miss this wonderful opportunity to acquire companies at fire-sale prices.

In the coming weeks I will be referring to old adages from Mr. Nick Murray. I find that his words of wisdom on markets and investing are the most clear and concise argument in the face of media driven adversity. There are no shades of grey, just precedence and fact... Markets always go up.

Stocks are inexpensive VS. Bonds!



Growth Stocks now are priced equally to Value Stocks!



I can't think of a more prudent arguement for investing in equities at present. Please feel free to counter this statement. Cheers.